I have been using JasperReports in our reporting solutions for a few years now. With a new commercial project I would like to make the move to JasperIntelligence. However I just discovered that it is GPL licensed. I am not sure about the intend of this and the consequences for me.
As far as I understand that does not allow me to use JasperIntelligence within my application. I can only use it as is in the form of a service. Is that correct?
If so, why does the manual talk about modifications to the config and the UI. Every user would have to give those changes back. Thats fine in terms of the config for a different database and so on but in terms of UI changes it wont fly so well here.
So if I basically bundle the JI war and ship as part of my preconfigured setup that includes the app server, my app and the JI I violate the license right?
So what can I do .. apart from forgetting about it and using JasperReports in its RAW form? (which is kind of like writing my own JI .. which I partly got ..)
The same problems apply to iReport btw. What are JasperSofts intentions? Relicence with LGPL or Apache licence. Offer a dual licence for commercial embedding?
There is nothing on the jasperforge site I could find even though this is crucial.
Any pointers would be great.
Thanks
manfred
13 Answers:
In short, if you want to distribute JasperIntelligence as part of your own application, or you use JasperIntelligence as part of a public web site, you either have to open source your code, or get a commercial license from JasperSoft.
iReport is GPL licensed in the same way as JasperIntelligence.
Sherman
JasperSoft
if you want to distribute JasperIntelligence as part of your own application |
If you plan on distributing (i.e. people accessing the application are not part of your organization) a software application containing JasperIntelligence... |
Does this means I need a commerial license if I want to deploy jasperIntelligence.war and config it how I want, and use a link in my own application to go to the report service? Or is it possible to do this under the gpl license without giving my application source free?
We are planning to use jasperIntelligence and distribute it to our clients but without modifing the source code or using parts of the source code.
See http://www.jaspersoft.com/pr_overview.html
for more details.
Sherman
JasperSoft
I am a bit confused by your statement. What is the difference between using a link that goes to ji or calling ji url from an application and embedding it into a portal.
How is using the url not embedding?
I am more than happy to provide our changes and improvements to JI back to the forge, but we certainly can not afford for our application to go GPL.
And what if I get a commercial licence. What are the terms and costs. How does the price change? What if JasperSoft goes down. Are we hosed then? These are risk that I have to weigh .. LGPL would avoid that and a support contract might still be handy..
manfred
See http://www.jaspersoft.com/ss_subscriptionservices-details.html
for support plans JasperSoft provides on an annual subscription basis.
In terms of JasperSoft not being around, I would say you have the ultimate protection: the source itself!
Sherman
JasperSoft
Oh and in terms of JasperSoft not being around or changing prices too much to able to afford it ... the source would not help if we use a commercial license because it would be only usable in a GPL way. So from a business sense using the GPL version is safer from the start as far as I can tell.
Of course I might be totally wrong here. And I do hope that JasperSoft is around for a long time and keep growing and prospering. I look forward to contribute our ji configurations if we find a way to use it.
Is this viewed as editing the "Source" code?
If so.. are you allowed to change it with a commercial license?
Thanks in advance,
Niels
Or you can get a commercial license from JasperSoft to allow distribution without the GPL requirements.
Sherman
JasperSoft
and i have a short question:
Can I:
1- Can I modify JI (view, bussiness,logic layers) so it
suits an a company? without pay for it o make my app
GPL?
2- Can I distribute JI with changes in the clients
without pay for it?
Why in http://www.jaspersoft.com/pr_overview.html
say that I must pay.... and in http://jasperforge.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.jasperserver/wiki/Li...
say that I can without pay ??????
so??
If you want to distribute (i.e. people accessing the application are not part of your organization) and you don't want to release your application as a GPL product, then you can get a commercial license from JasperSoft. This will free you from GPL considerations.
-Matt
JasperSoft
I was going through this thread today morning and I have a question which I felt is not answered yet.
1. We have JasperServer running on one of our servers and our application uses a URL to request a report and embeds into it.
2.We made some customizations as well to the report UI such as look and feel for better integration.
3. We do NOT distribute the application as a deployment to the customers but we only host the service which public can use.
My question is, can we use the JasperServer community edition for our production deployment as per the GPL?
If you distribute the application, then you need to comply with the GPL by distributing the source as well.
JasperServer 3.5 and earlier were released under GPL. Many folks felt that the terms of the GPL did not consider a hosted application, like you describe, to be distribution.
JasperServer 3.7 and later are distributed under the AGPL license. This license definitely considers that a hosted application is being distributed. Therefore you need to comply with the AGPL license and make the source to your complete solution (JasperServer plus other pieces) available.
If you prefer not to make all of your source available, you could get a commercial license from Jaspersoft which does not have such requirements (sales@jaspersoft.com).
I'm confident in these analyses. They are the standard understanding of the GPL type licenses. But as always it's better to get legal advice from a lawyer rather than from some guy on the internet.
Regards,
Matt