hello Strangely, I made new load test(pdf and rtf format), and all was ok. But I notice some differences between jr1.20 et jr1.3.0 about the virtualizer. When I've made load test with jr1.2.0, the cpu consumption was better with virtualizer than without it, but the response time was longer. With jr1.3.0, the consumption of cpu is still better using virtualizer, but the response time is also better! i made test about reports with 70 and 350 pages, simulating 10,50 and 100 simultaneous users making the same request. Could you confirm me that Virtualizer has been improved on those 2 points :cpu consumtion and response time? another question : what happens if we use virtualizer and the reports is in fact shorter than the parameter of the firualizer (exemeple, a report of 50 pages with a parameter to 60). regards Françoise